Материал: ABC-of-Rheumatology-ABC-Series-

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

Arthritis (2005) in the

United States

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Age

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All ages

48.3 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ages 18–44

8.6 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ages 45–64

21.3 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ages 65 and older

18.4 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Gender

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Women

38.2 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Men

25.7 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Region

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Northeast

12.9 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southeast

15.9 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Midwest

14.1 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Southwest

5.9 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

West

10.4 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a)

People with Arthritis 1990 and 2005

1990

 

 

 

 

 

< 15%

 

15–18%

> 18%

2005

By 2030, as the baby boom generation ages, an estimated 75 million Americans will be affected by arthritis.

Leading Causes of

Disability Among Persons

Age 18 Years and Older

Arthritis or rheumatism

Back or spine problem

Heart trouble

Lung or respiratory problem

Deafness or hearing problem

Limb/extremity stiffness

Mental or emotional problem

Diabetes

Blindness or vision problem

Stroke

 

 

 

 

 

 

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Percentage of all disability

Age-specific OA prevalence (%)

Men

OA prevalence (%)

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

DIP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTP1

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Knee

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hip

 

0

 

 

 

 

50

60

70

80

0

10

20

30

40

(b)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Age (yrs)

Women

OA prevalence (%)

80

 

 

 

 

 

 

DIP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

MTP1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Knee

 

40

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hip

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Age (yrs)

Figure 9.1 (a) Prevalence of OA in the US and disability figures overall. Data derived from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report and US Census (CDC, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007). (b) Age-specific OA prevalence by joint site. Adapted from van Saase et al., 1989, with permission of the publisher, BMJ Publishing Group. DIP = distal interphalangeal joint of the hand; MTP1 = first metatarsal phalangeal joint of the foot

Osteoarthritis 53

Pathways to osteoarthritis

Abnormal stress

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normal stress

 

Normal joint physiology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abnormal joint physiology

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obesity

 

Joint

 

 

Ageing

 

 

Trauma

 

 

 

Sepsis

 

 

 

destruction

 

 

 

 

Bone remodelling

 

 

 

Inflammation

 

 

 

pain

 

 

 

 

Abnormal anatomy

 

 

 

Genetic factors

 

 

 

disability

 

 

 

 

Altered joint loading

 

 

 

Biomaterial fatigue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cell/matrix injury

Aberrant repair response

Enzymatic degradation

Collagen disruption

Proteoglycan loss

Mechanical failure

Figure 9.2 Pathways to osteoarthritis. Taken from Poole et al. 2007, with permission of Dr Farshid Guilak and the publisher, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Aetiology of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis

Genetic

 

 

 

Environmental/

 

 

 

biomechanical

predisposition

 

 

 

 

 

 

triggers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50%

Injury

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

45–65%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smoking

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Joint degeneration

 

 

 

Autoimmune

non-autoimmune

 

 

 

disease

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OA

 

 

 

RA

Figure 9.3 Aetiologies of OA and RA

Table 9.1 Important risk factors for osteoarthritis

Risk factor

Notes

 

 

Genetics

Hand, knee and hip OA show strong heritability

 

(40–60%); this probably results from combinations of

 

multiple common polymorphisms rather than rare single

 

genes with a large individual effect

Race

Knee OA is prevalent across the world, whereas hip OA

 

is particularly prevalent in Caucasians

Age

Although not an inevitable consequence of ageing, OA

 

is strongly age-related; this may reflect the cumulative

 

effect of insults to the joint, aggravated by decline in

 

neuromuscular function, or senescence of homoeostatic

 

repair mechanisms

Sex

Women have a higher prevalence and radiographic

 

severity of OA at all joint sites apart from the hip.

 

Women are also more likely to have symptoms if

 

radiographic OA is present

Obesity

This is an important risk factor for knee OA, but a more

 

modest risk factor for hip and hand OA

Bone density

High density is a risk factor for development of knee,

 

hip and hand OA; low density is a risk factor for more

 

rapid progression of knee and hip OA

Abnormal joint

Acetabular dysplasia is a recognized cause of hip OA,

shape and

and distal femoral dysplasia (often overlooked) may

alignment

contribute to knee OA; varus or valgus malalignment

 

may be a risk for development and more rapid

 

progression of knee OA—this can have a major

 

interaction with obesity

Joint trauma and

Major joint injury is an important factor at the knee

usage

(especially if it causes subchondral fracture, meniscal

 

injury or ligament rupture) and can cause OA at any

 

site; recognized occupational hazards include farming

 

(hip OA), underground mining (knee OA), professional

 

soccer (knee OA) and some heavy manual jobs (hand

 

OA)

 

 

Percent <65 years severely disabled/unable to work

60.0%

50.0%

40.0%

30.0%

20.0%

10.0%

0.0%

Men

Women

51.0%

 

47.5%

 

47.0%

 

44.5%

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.7% 4.5%

OA

 

RA

No arthritis

Figure 9.4 Relative work disability for OA and RA. Data taken from Pincus et al., 1989, based on 1978 US Social Security Survey of Disability and Work. In the original paper, OA and RA were referred to by their respective surrogates: asymmetric oligoarthritis and symmetric polyarthritis

resting (“gelling”), in the absence of systemic symptoms (fatigue, fever) or other system involvement. Joint stiffness arises, at least in part, from the accumulation of hyaluronan (a joint lubricant and the most abundant constituent of synovial fluid) and hyaluronan fragments in the deep layers of arthritic synovium during periods of rest, excluding water within the synovial tissue. Joint movement mobilizes hyaluronan from the tissue to the lymphatics and blood with attendant hydration of synovial tissue and improvement in joint stiffness symptoms (Engstrom-Laurent, 1987). The cartilage changes that accompany OA encourage deposition of crystals— both calcium crystals (calcium pyrophosphate and basic calcium phosphates), especially at the knee, and urate crystals. Patients with OA may therefore develop superadded acute pseudogout (mainly knees and wrists), and are at increased risk of secondary gout if they are on long-term diuretics or have chronic renal impairment (see Chapter 10).

54 ABC of Rheumatology

Distribution of primary OA and RA

(a)

(b)

 

Figure 9.6 Hands with Heberden’s nodes (bony enlargement of distal interphalangeal joints) and Bouchard’s nodes (bony enlargement of proximal interphalangeal joints)

Examination

The main clinical features of OA are symptoms, functional impairment and signs. Considerable discordance can exist between these three (Figure 9.8). Pain may arise from several sites in and around an osteoarthritic joint (Table 9.2). Suggested mechanisms include increased intra-capsular and intra-osseous pressure, subchondral microfracture and enthesopathy or bursitis secondary to muscle weakness and structural alteration. Severity of pain and functional impairment are greatly influenced by personality, anxiety, depression, daily activity and reduced muscle strength and proprioception (muscle performs an important proprioceptive role).

OA

RA

Figure 9.5 Pattern of joint distribution of primary OA and RA

 

Women soccer ACL

Men soccer ACL inj

Men & Women meniscus

 

inj 12 y follow-up

14 y follow-up

inj 15–20 y follow-up

%OA

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

40

30

20

10

0

15–24

25–34

35–44

45–54

55–62

65–74

75–84

Age class

Figure 9.7 Prevalence of knee OA after injury compared with baseline risk. Taken from Roos, 2005, with permission of Dr Ewa Roos and the publisher, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Table 9.2 Types of joint pain in OA

Nature of pain

Probable aetiology of pain

 

 

Pain with use

Mechanical joint damage, enthesopathy from

 

ligament or ligamentous attachments

Pain at rest

Inflammation with effusion and joint capsule

 

distension

Pain at night

Intra-osseous hypertension

Sudden flare of pain

Crystal synovitis, torn meniscus, exacerbation of

 

cartilage breakdown due to abnormal stressor

 

with secondary synovitis from pro-inflammatory

 

cascade due to release of cartilage matrix

 

fragments; consider sepsis as a rare possibility

 

 

Osteoarthritis 55

Figure 9.8 The discordance between radiographic OA and symptoms in the hands (distal interphalangeal joints, knees and hip). Taken from Arden and Nevitt, 2006, with permission of Drs Nigel Arden and Michael Nevitt and the publisher, Elsevier

Pain and radiographic OA

Prevalence of pain (%)

Men

100

80

60

 

 

40

 

 

20

 

 

0

2

3–4

0–1

 

Radiographic grade

Prevalence of pain (%)

Women

100

DIPS

80

 

Knee

 

Hip

 

 

60

 

 

40

 

 

20

 

 

0

2

3–4

0–1

 

Radiographic grade

Crepitus, bony enlargement, deformity, instability and restricted movement may occur together and predominantly reflect structural changes. Varying degrees of synovitis (warmth, effusion and synovial thickening) may be superimposed, especially noticeable in knees, and muscle weakness or wasting is extremely common.

Assessment aims to establish the source of symptoms in each patient. When diffuse and generalized tender points are identified at tendon insertion sites, then the co-occurrence of fibromyalgia should be considered and attention to improving sleep be included in the management considerations. Only an adequate history and examination can determine how much structural and inflammatory change is present and how much these contribute to a patient’s problems.

Box 9.1 European and US Guidelines for management of OA

The management plan must be individualized, taking into account the site and severity of OA symptoms, any co-morbidity, concurrent medications and patient acceptability

Non-pharmacological treatments are central—drug treatments are adjuncts

A core and option approach is required—all patients should be offered education, an exercise programme, advice to reduce adverse mechanical factors and paracetamol as the first oral analgesic to try; there is a wide range of other treatment options from which to select additional treatments, as required

Diagnosis

Typical OA can be diagnosed by history and examination alone. Currently the main investigation that can help confirm OA is the plain X-ray, with demonstration of characteristic structural abnor- malities—focal joint-space narrowing (due to cartilage loss), marginal osteophyte or “spur” formation and subchondral sclerosis of bone (Figure 9.9). It is increasingly recognized that biochemical abnormalities of the joint precede radiographic abnormalities by as much as decades. For this reason, much effort is currently being put into identifying more sensitive imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging, bone scintigraphy and ultrasound, along with biochemical indicators in blood, urine or synovial fluid, that might identify and quantify OA more precisely and earlier than by X-ray.

Management

The goals of medical management of OA (summarized in Figure 9.10) are to: (a) provide patient education and information access;

(b) relieve pain; (c) optimize function; and (d) minimize disease

progression. See Box 9.1 for European and US guidelines on management of OA.

Symptoms of OA often are episodic. It is therefore advisable to provide the patient with an armamentarium of treatment options to choose from during periods of relative quiescence and relative flare.

Patient education and information access

This is a professional responsibility, but education also improves outcome and is a treatment in its own right. The myth that OA is a progressive wearing-out of joints due to old age still persists; this invariably leads to inappropriate reductions in activity. A major contribution to managing OA has been the finding that a patient’s psychological status (anxiety, depression and social support) is an important determinant of symptomatic and functional outcome. Good evidence supports the use of educational programmes to help patients understand OA and develop self-management strategies.

56 ABC of Rheumatology

(a)

Hip joint

(b)

Tibiofemoral knee joint

Patellofemoral knee joint

Sclerosis

Joint-space narrowing

Joint-space narrowing

Osteophyte

Sclerosis

Osteophyte

(c) Joint-space narrowing

Figure 9.9 Radiographic OA: representative images of a hand (a), a hip (b) and a knee (c) with radiographic OA

Источник: https://studfile.net/preview/16670064/