Материал: disser_arhipov
3
§ 3.7. Materials that lost their relevance in the context of the “right to be
forgotten”.................................................................................................................... |
|
|
115 |
|
§ 3.8. Problems of legal separation between gambling games and games that |
||||
cannot be considered as the gambling ones ............................................................... |
116 |
|||
§ 4. |
The concept of the medial turn as a generalization of key features of the |
|||
socio-cultural context of the problem ............................................................................ |
|
119 |
||
§ 5. |
Forming of the hypothesis of the semantic limits of law: virtual reality, |
|||
absurdity and common sense.......................................................................................... |
|
|
141 |
|
CHAPTER 2. The quest for the methodology of resolving the problem of and |
||||
reconstructing the semantic limits of law........................................................................... |
|
151 |
||
§ 1. |
Attempts of reconstructing the limits of law based on the approaches of moral |
|||
philosophy ...................................................................................................................... |
|
|
151 |
|
§ 2. |
Hart-Fuller debate |
and |
consequent re-consideration of the |
debate’s |
discourse......................................................................................................................... |
|
|
|
164 |
§ 3. |
Assessment of the semantic limits of law based on the approaches that |
|||
pretend to have an understanding of absurdity .............................................................. |
173 |
|||
§ 3.1. Selected examples of references to absurdity in the Russian practice of |
||||
application of law ....................................................................................................... |
|
|
174 |
|
§ 3.2. Development of |
the |
“absurdity doctrine” in the context of |
foreign |
|
practice of application of law..................................................................................... |
|
|
187 |
|
§ 3.3. Assessment of the ideas of absurdity through the prism of the concepts of |
||||
common sense ............................................................................................................ |
|
|
193 |
|
§ 3.4. Preliminary conclusions on qualities and kinds of absurd in interpretation |
||||
and application of law ................................................................................................ |
|
|
198 |
|
|
4 |
|
§ 4. |
Reconstructing the semantic limits of law with the help of deontic logic: an |
|
experience of reconsideration......................................................................................... |
200 |
|
§ 4.1. Critical overview of the theory of the semantic normativity |
by |
|
Matthias Klatt............................................................................................................. |
201 |
|
§ 4.2. General remarks on the semantic limits of law, exclusive positivism and |
||
deontic logic ............................................................................................................... |
209 |
|
§ 5. |
Interdisciplinary concept of the “magic circle” in game studies .................. |
213 |
§ 6. |
The concept of generalized symbolic media in theoretical sociology.......... |
231 |
CHAPTER 3. Reconstructing of the conception of the semantic limits of law: |
||
contents, significance, methodological potential ............................................................... |
246 |
|
§ 1. |
Reconsidering the problem of the “magic circle”: from qualification of social |
|
relationships to qualification of their object................................................................... |
246 |
|
§ 2. |
The criterion of seriousness or non-seriousness of object of relationships: |
|
“socio-currency value”................................................................................................... |
251 |
|
§ 3. |
Modeling of commodification as a methodology for calculating convertible |
|
socio-currency value ...................................................................................................... |
256 |
|
§ 4. The criterion of functional adequacy or “fantasy nature” of object of social |
||
relationships.................................................................................................................... |
264 |
|
§ 5. Theoretical modeling of application of the criteria of socio-currency value |
||
and functional adequacy................................................................................................. |
278 |
|
§ 6. Spin-off results: analogy of law and game, seriousness as a principle of |
||
morality of law, claim of law to seriousness.................................................................. |
291 |
|
§ 6.1. Analogy of law and game in the history of legal thought and in the |
||
context of this research............................................................................................... |
291 |
|
5
§ 6.2. “Claim to seriousness” and the ninth principle of internal morality of
law .............................................................................................................................. |
300 |
CONCLUSION........................................................................................................ |
308 |
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTATION CONVENTIONS..................... |
314 |
LIST OF LITERATURE ......................................................................................... |
315 |
Sources in Russian language................................................................................ |
315 |
Normative sources ........................................................................................... |
315 |
Legal practice................................................................................................... |
318 |
Academic articles............................................................................................. |
323 |
Monographs and other books........................................................................... |
330 |
Dissertations..................................................................................................... |
334 |
Mass-media, blogs and other Internet sources................................................. |
335 |
Sources in foreign languages ............................................................................... |
337 |
Normative sources ........................................................................................... |
337 |
Legal practice................................................................................................... |
337 |
Academic articles............................................................................................. |
338 |
Monographs and other books........................................................................... |
343 |
Mass-media, blogs and other Internet sources................................................. |
344 |
Annex 1. Structural flowchart of the logic of the concept of the semantic limits of |
|
law ...................................................................................................................................... |
348 |
Annex 2. Functional flowchart of analytical process of application of the concept of |
|
the semantic limits of law (“borderline situation” of interpretation)................................. |
349 |
6
Annex 3. The table of correspondence between expressions of legal dogma and the
notions of the concept of the semantic limits of law.......................................................... |
353 |
7
INTRODUCTION
Relevance of the research topic. Law is now increasingly dwelling in the “penumbra”, the idea of which, in the special sense of the philosophy of law, was formulated in the discussion between H. Hart and L. Fuller in the middle of the XXth century.1 The ongoing digital transformation of society implies not just the development of technologies – many of them are not divorced from everyday life and change social reality to the same extent that they change the technological landscape. Modern digital technologies predetermine the formation of the information culture in which new communication practices emerge and the old ones change. In the cultural and sociological discourses, research of various aspects of the medial turn and virtual reality is of particular importance. Among the current technological phenomena of social and humanitarian discourse, above all, those that are directly aimed at social interaction catch our interest. The opportunities of social networks, instant messengers and various other multi-user environments (among which, for the purposes of this study, the videogame ones are or particular relevance) have already given rise to a number of, at first glance, isolated and funny legal problems, which in this research are interpreted as, first of all, the problems of theory of law, namely – of interpretation of legal texts and application of law.2 For example, making law enforcement decisions about blocking Internet resources containing information on the objects related to game context, as it happened in the case of blocking of the information on manufacturing of virtual
1See: Hart H.L.A. The Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals // Harvard Law Review. – 1958. – Vol. 71. – P. 593–629; Fuller L.L. Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart // Harvard Law Review. – 1958. – Vol. 71.
– P. 630–672. The discussion was published in translation into Russian in the journal “Proceedings of Higher Education Institutions. Law" in 2005, see Hart H.L.A. Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals / Transl. into Russian by V.V. Arkhipov // Proceedings of Higher Education Institutions. Law. – 2005. – No. 5. – PP. 102–136; Fuller L.L. Positivism and Fidelity to Law – a Reply to Professor Hart / Transl. into Russian by V.V. Arkhipov // Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Jurisprudence. 2005. No. 6. PP. 124–159. The fundamental importance of this discussion for jurisprudence can be considered as a well-known fact in legal studies, and many foreign and domestic authors wrote about it. See e.g.: Ogleznev V.V., Surovtsev V.A. Philosophical Views of the «Early» H. Hart and the Problems of Legal Language // Hart H.L.A. Philosophy and Legal Language. М., 2017. PP. 7–26.
2 This is the reason for the specialty of 12.00.01, which is attributed to the present study, in which the issues of the
operation of law in the media space are considered from the point of view of general theoretical problems of interpretation of law, as well as the implementation and application of law, with their subsequent interpretation as also related to the problems of ontology of law. Accordingly, we are talking about paragraphs 1.14, 1.13 and 1.1 of the Passport of the Specialty 12.00.01 as of September 2019.