Список литературы
1Кузнецова, 1982 - Кузнецова Н.И. Наука в ее истории (методологические проблемы). М.: Наука, 1982. 473 с.
2Кун, 2001 - Кун Т.Логика открытия или психология исследования // Кун Т. Структура научных революций. М.: АСТ, 2001. С. 539-592.
3Маркова, 2004 - Маркова Л.А Томас Кун вчера и сегодня // Философия науки. Вып. 10. М.: ИФ РАН, 2004. С. 29-48.
4Порус, 2008 - Порус В.Н. Между философией и историей науки: на пути к «гибкой» теории научной рациональности // ИмреЛакатос. Избранные произведения по философии и методологии науки. М.: Академический проект, 2008. С. 9-26.
5Порус, 2002 - Порус В.Н. Рациональность. Наука. Культура. М.: Наука, 2002. 351 с.
6Порус, 1995 - Порус В.Н. Рыцарь Ratio// Вопросы философии. 1995. № 4. С. 127-134.
7Родный, 1973 - Родный Н.И. Проблема научной революции в концепции развития науки Т. Куна / Концепции науки в буржуазной философии и социологии. М.: Знание, 1973. C. 41-52.
8Brush, 1975 - Brush S. Should History of Science Be Rated X? // Science. 1975. Vol. 183. P. 1164-1183.
9Collins, Evans, 2019 - Collins H., Evans R. Populism and Science // Эпистемологияифилософиянауки / Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2019. Vol. 56. No. 4. P. 200-218.
10Conant, 1957 - Conant J.B. Harvard Case Histories // Experimental Science. Vol. I-II. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1957. 639 pp.
11Fuller, 2007 - Fuller S. New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: Polity, 2007. 232 pp.
12Fuller, 2000 - Fuller S. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2000. 490 pp.
13Kuhn, 1970 - Kuhn T.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. 210 pp.
14Lakatos, Musgrave, 1970 - Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge / Ed. by I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave. Cambridge: CambridgeUniv. Press, 1970. 282 pp.
15Motycka, 1980 - Motycka A. Relatywistycznawizjanauki. Analizakrytycznakoncepcji T.S. Kuhna i S.E. Toulmina. Wroclaw: Ossolineum, 1980. 202 pp.
16Popper, 1994 - Popper K. The Moral Responsibility of the Scientist // Popper K. The Myth of the Framework. L.: Routledge, 1994. P. 121-129.
17Kasavin, 2017 - Kasavin I. T. Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects // Social Epistemology. 2017. Vol. 31 (1). P. 1-15.
References
1Brush, S. “Should History of Science Be Rated X?”, Science, 1975, vol. 183, pp. 1164-1183.
2Collins, H. & Evans, R. “Populism and Science”, Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2019, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 200-218.
3Conant, J.B. “Harvard Case Histories”, in: Experimental Science, vols. I-II. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1957, 639 pp.
4Fuller, S. New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: Polity, 2007, 232 pp.
5Fuller, S. Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000, 490 pp.
6Kuhn, T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970. 210 pp.
7Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970, 282 pp.
8Markova L.A. “Thomas Kuhn vcheraisegodnja” [Thomas Kuhn: Yesterday and Today], Filosofianauki [Philosophy of Science], iss. 10. Moscow: IPh RAS, 2004, pp. 29-48. (In Russian)
9Motycka, A. Relatywistycznawizjanauki. Analizakrytycznakoncepcji T.S. Kuhnai S.E. Toulmina. Wroclaw: Ossolineum. 1980, 202 pp.
10Popper, K. “The Moral Responsibility of the Scientist”, in: Popper, K. The Myth of the Framework. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 121-129.
11Kasavin, I.T. “Towards a Social Philosophy of Science: Russian Prospects”, Social Epistemology, 2017, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 1-15.
12Kuznetsova, N.I. Nauka v eeistorii (metodologicheskieproblemy) [Science in Its History: Methodological Issues]. Moscow: Znenie, 1982, pp. 76-77. (In Russian)
13Kuhn, Т. “Logikaotkrityailipsykhologiaissledovanija”, in: Kuhn, Т. Strukturanauchnikhrevolyutsiy [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow: AST, 2001, pp. 539-592. (In Russian)
14Porus, V.N. “Mezhdufilosofieiiistorieinauki: na putik «gibkoi» teoriinauchnoiratsional'nosti” [Between Philosophy and History of Science: On the Way to a Flexible Theory of Scientific Rationality], in: Imre Lakatos. Izbrannyeproizvedeniya po filosofiiimetodologiinauki [Imre Lakatos. Selected Works in Philosophy and Methodology of Science]. Moscow: Akademicheskijprojekt, 2008, pp. 9-26. (In Russian)
15Porus, V.N. Razionalnost. Nauka. Kultura. [Rationality. Science. Culture]. Moscow: Nauka, 2002, 351 pp. (In Russian)
16Porus, V.N. “Rytsar Ratio” [Knight of Ratio], Voprosyfilosofii, 1995, no. 4, pp. 127-134. (In Russian)
17Rodnij, N.I. “Problemanauchnoirevolyutsii v kontseptsiirazvitiyanauki T. Kuna” [The Problem of Scientific Revolution in Thomas Kuhn's Concept of the Development of Science], in: Kontseptsiinauki v burzhuaznoifilosofiiisotsiologii [Concepts of Science in the Bourgeois Philosophy and Sociology]. Moscow: Znanie, 1973, pp. 41-52. (InRussian)