Статья: Теоретические подходы к исследованию психологического обеспечения управления кадровой работой в научной организации

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

23. Разина Т. В. Структурно-функциональная организация и генезис мотивации научной деятельности: дисс. … д. психол. наук. Ярославль, 2016. 612 с.

24. Nonaka I., von Krogh G., Voelpel S. Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory: Evolutionary Paths and Future Advances // Organization Studies. 2006. Vol. 27, Issue 8. P. 1179-1208. DOI: 10.1177/0170840606066312

25. Nonaka I., Toyama R., Konno N. SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation // Long Range Planning. 2000. Vol. 33, Issue 1. P. 5-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6

26. Creative environments: Issues of Creativity Support for the Knowledge Civilization Age / A. P. Wierzbicki, Y. Nakamori (Eds.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007. 509 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71562-7

27. Lee M. R. Leading Virtual Project Teams: Adapting Leadership Theories and Communications Techniques to 21st Century Organizations. 1st ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2013. 217 p.

28. Magnusson P., Schuster A., Taras V. A Process-Based Explanation of the Psychic Distance Paradox: Evidence from Global Virtual Teams // Management International Review. 2014. Vol. 54, Issue 3. P. 283-306. DOI: 10.1007/s11575-014-0208-5

29. Pangil F., Chan J. M. The mediating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between trust and virtual team effectiveness // Journal of Knowledge Management. 2014. Vol. 18, Issue 1. P. 92-106. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-09-2013-0341

30. Morley S., Cormican K., Folan P. An Analysis of Virtual Team Characteristics: A Model for Virtual Project Managers // Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 2015. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 188-203. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242015000100014

31. Merkeviиius J., Davidaviиienл V., Raudeliыnienл J., Buleca J. Virtual organization: specifics of creation of personnel management system // E&M Economics and Management. 2015. Vol. 18, Issue 4. P. 200-211. DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2015-4-014

References

1. Feist G. J. The psychology of scientific thought and behavior. The Psychologist, 2013, V. 26, no. 12, pp. 864-867.

2. Mehtap Ц., Kцkalan Ц. Prevailing organizational identity strength: The relationship between identity, justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 2014, V. 6, Issue 1, pp. 32-46.

3. Muppidathi P., Krishnan V. R. Effect of transformational leadership on followers' collective efficacy and group cohesiveness: Social identity as mediator. Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 2015, no. 04 (03), pp. 363-372. Available at: http://www.rkvenkat.org/mythili.pdf (Accessed 11 May 2018).

4. Gibson D. S., Thompson C. B., Neill U. S. Assessing research productivity. The Scientist, 2015, January 1. Available at: http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles. view/articleno/41682/title/Assessing-Research-Productivity/ (Accessed 25 January 2018).

5. Sшrensen H. T. I-determinants for a successful PhD or postdoctoral outcome. Clinical Epidemiology, 2016, V. 8, pp. 297-303. DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S110527

6. van der Lee R., Ellemers N. Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. PNAS, 2015, V. 112, no. 40, pp. 12349-12353. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1510159112

7. Albert C., Davia M. A., Legazpe N. Determinants of research productivity in Spanish Academia. European Journal of Education, 2016, V. 51, Issue 4, pp. 535-549. DOI: 10.1111/ejed.12142

8. Antonio-Garcнa M. T., Lуpez-Navarro I., Rey-Rocha J. Determinants of success for biomedical researchers: A perception-based study in a health science research environment. Scientometrics, 2014, V. 101, Issue 3, pp. 1747-1779. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1376-6

9. Gaidamashko I. V., Kandybovich S. L., Sekach M. F. Psychology: Theory and practice. Psychological and Pedagogical Search, 2017, no. 4 (44), pp. 65-74. Available at: http://ppsjournal.rsu.edu.ru/wp-content/ uploads/%D0%9F%D0%9F%D0%9F-2017-%E2%84%96444.pdf (Accessed 25 January 2018).

10. Karro I. I., Popova A. A. Innovation management in Russia. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii - Modern High Technologies, 2013, no. 10-2, pp. 263-264 (in Russian).

11. Prokhorov A. P. Russkaya model' upravleniya [The Russian model of management]. Moscow, Studiya Artemiya Lebedeva Publ., 2014. 496 p.

12. Sidorenkov A. V., Koval' E. S. Interrelations between group phenomena and socio-psychological adaptation among employees. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2015, V. 36, no. 1, pp. 34-45 (in Russian).

13. Arister N. I., Antsupov A. Ya., Gaidamashko I. V. Strategiya i praktika dostizheniya vysshei kvalifikatsii sub"ektom innovatsionnogo truda [The strategy and practice of achieving the highest qualification by the subject of innovative labor]. Moscow, Buki Vedi Publ., 2016. 541 p.

14. Berestneva E. V. Problems of assessing the research potential. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya - Fundamental Research, 2015, no. 2 (19), pp. 4151-4153 (in Russian).

15. Voitikova M. A. The impact of emotional intelligence on the success of managing scientific organization. Chelovecheskii kapital - Journal of Human Capital, 2017, no. 12 (108), pp. 36-40 (in Russian).

16. Gaidamashko I. V., Pugacheva E. V., Tsunikova T. G. The systemic mental activity approach to activity self-organization among subjects of the educational process at a technical university. Chelovecheskii kapital - Journal of Human Capital, 2015, no. 11-12 (83), pp. 20-23 (in Russian).

17. Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya V. G. Psikhologiya innovatsionnogo menedzhmenta organizatsii [Psychology of the innovative management of organizations]. Chelyabinsk, South Ural State University Publ., 2013. 298 p.

18. Pugacheva E. V. Psychological determinants of professional reliability in members of institutions of higher professional education. Modern Psychology, 2013, no. 2. Available at: http://modernpsy.org/ru/2013/2/5 (Accessed 25 January 2018).

19. Yarkova T. A. Scientific foundations for managing students' research activities in educational institutions of higher education. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta - Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 2013, no. 3, pp. 215-228 (in Russian).

20. Feist G. J. The development of scientific talent in Westinghouse finalists and members of the National Academy of Sciences. Journal of Adult Development, 2006, V. 13, Issue 1, pp. 23-35. DOI: 10.1007/s10804-006-9002-3

21. Simonton D. K. Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 1988, V. 104, no. 2, pp. 251-267.

22. Vermeir K. Scientific research: Commodities or commons? Science & Education, 2013, V. 22, Issue 10, pp. 2485-2510. DOI: 10.1007/s11191-012-9524-y

23. Razina T. V. Strukturno-funktsional'naya organizatsiya i genezis motivatsii nauchnoi deyatel'nosti [Structural and functional organization and the genesis of scientific activity motivation]. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Psych.). Yaroslavl, 2016. 612 p.

24. Nonaka I., von Krogh G., Voelpel S. Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 2006, V. 27, Issue 8, pp. 1179-1208. DOI: 10.1177/0170840606066312

25. Nonaka I., Toyama R., Konno N. SECI, Ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 2000, V. 33, Issue 1, pp. 5-34. DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6

26. Wierzbicki A. P., Nakamori Y. (eds.) Creative environments: Issues of creativity support for the knowledge civilization age. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2007. 509 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71562-7

27. Lee M. R. Leading virtual project teams: Adapting leadership theories and communications techniques to 21st century organizations. Boca Raton, CRC Press, 2013. 217 p.

28. Magnusson P., Schuster A., Taras V. A process-based explanation of the psychic distance paradox: Evidence from global virtual teams. Management International Review, 2014, V. 54, Issue 3, pp. 283-306. DOI: 10.1007/s11575-014-0208-5

29. Pangil F., Chan J. M. The mediating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between trust and virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2014, V. 18, Issue 1, pp. 92-106. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-09-2013-0341

30. Morley S., Cormican K., Folan P. An analysis of virtual team characteristics: A model for virtual project managers. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2015, V. 10, no. 1, pp. 188-203. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-27242015000100014

31. Merkeviиius J., Davidaviиienл V., Raudeliыnienл J., Buleca J. Virtual organization: Specifics of creation of personnel management system. E&M Economics and Management, 2015, V. 18, Issue 4, pp. 200-211. DOI: 10.15240/ tul/001/2015-4-014

Источник: https://otherreferats.allbest.ru/download/1112630/