Материал: disser_arhipov

Внимание! Если размещение файла нарушает Ваши авторские права, то обязательно сообщите нам

386

255.Arkhipov V.V., Naumov V.B. Pervasive Legal Problems of the Internet of Things and the Limits of Law: Russian Perspective // Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2018. Т. 13. № 6. С. 94–123.

256.Arkhipov V., Naumov V., The Legal Definition of Personal Data in the Regulatory Environment of the Russian Federation: Between Formal Certainty and Technological Development // Computer Law and Security Review. – Dorchester (UK), 2016. – Volume 32. – Issue 6. PP. – 868–887.

257.Arkhipov V.V., Virtual Worlds in Legal Studies. An Inquiry into the Subject of Research / 25th IVR World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy Paper [Electronic resource] // Social Sciences Research Network. – [Site]. – URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2117762 (accessed: 04.02.2019).

258.Austin J. Truth / Supplementary Volume XXIV, 1950 [Electronic resource] // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. The Virtual Issue No. 1. 2013. – [Site]. – URL: https://www.aristoteliansociety.org.uk/pdf/austin.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2019).

259.Bix B. Cautions and Caveats for the Application of Wittgenstein to Legal Theory [Electronic resource] / Law and Social Justice, Campbell, O’Rourke & Shier, eds, MIT Press, pp. 217–229 // Social Science Research Network. – [Site]. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=619123 (accessed: 10.09.2019).

260.Bix B. Robert Alexy, Radbruch’s Formula, and the Nature of Legal Theory // Rechtstheorie.

Vol. 37. – 2006. – PP. 139–149.

261.Bix B. Radbruch’s Formula and Conceptual Analysis // The American Journal of Jurisprudence. 2011. Vol. 56. PP. 45 – 57.

262.Blackwell C., Carroll J. Minecraft Economics: A Study of Wealth Inequality in a Virtual World [Electronic resource] // Social Science Research Network. – 4 June 2018. – [Site]. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3185048 (accessed: 04.07.2018).

263.Briquel D. The Punishment of the Hellespont by Xerxes: Perception of Religious Behaviour of the Enemy in Conflict Situations [Electronic resource] // Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2016. No. 2. P. 51.

URL: https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/136219 (accessed: 28.01.2019).

264.Castronova E. The Right to Play // New York Law School Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 49. – No. 1. – PP. 185-210.

265.Chernilo D. The Theorization of Social Co-Ordinations in Differentiated Societies: The Theory of Generalized Symbolic Media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas // British Journal of Sociology. 2002. Vol. 53. Issue 3. – PP. 431 – 449.

387

266.Consalvo M. There is No Magic Circle [Electronic resource] // Games and Culture. – 2009. – Vol. 4, Issue 4. PP. 408 – 417. – URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1555412009343575 (accessed: 02.07.2018).

267.Dalton H.L. “Disgust” and Punishment // The Yale Law Journal. 1986-1987. Vol. 96. PP.

881–913.

268.Dickerson R. Statutory Interpretation: Core Meaning and Marginal Uncertainty // Missoury Law Review. – 1964. – Vol. 29. – PP. 1–12.

269.Duxbury N. Golden Rule Reasoning, Moral Judgment, and Law // Notre Dame Law Review. 2009. Vol. 84. Issue 4. PP. 1529–1605.

270.Dworkin R. Lord Devlin and the Enforcement of Morals // The Yale Law Journal. 19651966. Vol. 75. P. 986–1005.

271.Fairfield J., The Language-Game of Privacy // Michigan Law Review. – 2018. – Vol. 116. Issue 6. – P. 1171.

272.Fairfield J. The Magic Circle // Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law. – 2009. – No. 1 (May). – PP. 823 – 840.

273.Fuller L.L. Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart // Harvard Law Review. 1958. Vol. 71. P. 630-672.

274.Hamari J., Sjöblom M. What is eSports and why do people watch it? // Internet Research. – Vol. 27. – Issue 2. – PP. 211–232.

275.Hare R.M. The Promising Game // Revue Internationale de Philosophie. – 1964. – Vol. 18. – No. 70(4). – PP. 398–412. – URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23940466 (accessed: 26 July 2018).

276.Hart H.L.A. The Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals // Harvard Law Review. 1958. Vol. 71. P. 593-629.

277.Jellum L.D. But That Is Absurd! Why Specific Absurdity Undermines Textualism // Brooklyn Law Review. 2011. Vol. 76. PP. 917–939.

278.Jiang M. Authoritarian Informationalism: China’s Approach to Internet Sovereignty // SAIS Review of International Affairs. 2010. No. 30(2). PP. 71-89. – Available at Social Science Research

Network [Electronic resource]. – [Site]. – URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1702128 (accessed: 02.10.2018).

279. Jackson B.S. Towards a semiotic model of the games analogy in Jurisprudence // Droit et société. – 1991. – No. 17-18. – PP. 99 – 123. – doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/dreso.1991.1105.

388

280.Johnson H.M. The Generalized Symbolic Media in Parsons’ Theory // Sociology & Social Research. 1973. – PP. 208 – 221.

281.Klatt M. Semantic Normativity and the Objectivity of Legal Argumentation // ARSP: Archiv fur Rechtsund Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. 2004. Vol.

90.No. 1. PP. 51–65.

282.Lastowka G. The Player-Authors Project [Electronic resource] // Social Science Research Network. – 30 November 2013. – [Site]. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2361758 (accessed: 04.07.2018).

283.Lessig L. The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach [Electronic resource] // Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University Website. – [Site]. – URL: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/finalhls.pdf (accessed: 26.01.2019).

284.MacCormick N. Legal Deduction, Legal Predicates and Expert Systems // Revue Internationale de semiotique juridique. – 1992. – Vol. 5. – P. 181–202.

285.Malaby T.M. Beyound Play: A New Approach to Games. [Electronic resource] // Social Science Research Network [Site]. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=922456 (accessed: 02.07.2018).

286.Manning J.F. The Absurdity Doctrine // Harvard Law Review. 2003. Vol. 116. PP. 2387–

2486.

287.Marmor A. The Pragmatics of Legal Language // Ratio Juris. – 2008. – No. 4. – PP. 423–

288.McIntyre J. Making the Law Explicit: The Normativity of Legal Argumentation. By Matthias Klatt // The Cambridge Law Journal. 2011. Vol. 70. No. 3. – PP. 674–676.

289.Midgley M. The Game Game // Philosophy. – 1974. – No. 189 (Jul., 1974). – PP. 231–253. – URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3750115 (accessed: 26 July 2018).

290.Nyberg A.K. Seal of Approval: The Origins and History of the Comics Code. Vol 1. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1994. – 1228 p. – [Electronic resource]. – [Site]. – URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=WGDschFUKRQC&hl=ru&source=gbs_navlinks_s (accessed: 15.01.2019).

291.Polyakov A., The St. Petersburg School of Legal Philosophy and Russian Legal Thought // Russian Legal Realism / Ed. by Brozek B., Stanek J. and Stelmach J. – Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2018. – PP. 1–36.

389

292.Radbruch G. Statutory Lawlesness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946) // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2006. Vol. 26. No. 1. PP. 1 – 11.

293.Raessens J. The Ludic Turn in Media Theory / Lecture. 2012 [Electronic resource] / Utrecht University Repository. – [Site]. – URL: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/255181 (accessed: 03.08.2019).

294.Rodriguez H. The Playful and the Serious: An approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens [Electronic resource] / Game Studies. The International Journal of Computer Game Research. 2006. Vol.

6.Issue 1 // “Game Studies”. – [Site]. – URL: http://gamestudies.org/0601/articles/rodriges (accessed: 25.07.2019).

295.Rustad M.L., D’Angelo D. The Path of Internet Law: An Annotated Guide to Legal Landmarks // Social Science Research Network Website, URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1799578 (accessed: 24.01.2019).

296.Sergeyeva O., Tsareva A., Zinoveva N., Kononova O. Social Skills Amongst MMORPGGamers: Empirical Study // SHS Web of Conferences. – 2018. – No. 50. PP. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001008.

297.Stanton-Ife J. The Limits of Law [Electronic resource] // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). – [Site]. – URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/law-limits/ (accessed: 17.10.2018).

298.Staszewski G. Avoiding Absurdity // Indiana Law Journal. 2006. Vol. 81. PP. 1001–1065.

299.Stenros J. In Defence of Magic Circle: The Social and Mental Boundaries of Play [Electronic resource] / Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2012 Conference: Local and Global – Games in Culture and Society // Digital Games Research Association. – [Site]. – URL: http://www.digra.org/wp- content/uploads/digital-library/12168.43543.pdf (accessed: 06.02.2019).

300.Thacker L.E. Interpretation and Legal Theory. A. Marmor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992,

193pp. (Review) // Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies. – 1993. – Vol. 2. – PP. 330–338.

301.Treviňo J., Talcott Parsons Today. His Theory and Legacy in Contemporary Sociology / Ed. by A. Javier Treviňo, Foreword by Neil J. Smelser. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2001.

– 261 p.

302.Turner T.S. Parsons’ Concept of “Generalized Media of Social Interaction” and its Relevance for Social Anthropology // Sociological Inquiry. 1968. Vol. 38. Issue 2. – PP. 121 – 134.

390

303.Turner B.S., Preface to the New Edition // Parsons T., The Social System. London: Routledge, 1991. – pp. 14 – 31.

304.Van Doren J.W. Theories of Professors H.L.A. Hart and Ronald Dworkin – A Critique // Cleveland State Law Review. 1980. Vol. 279. PP. 279 – 309.

Монографии и иные книги

305.Brandom. R.B. Making It Explicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press, 1994. – 741 p.

306.Caenegem R.C. van. An Historical Introduction to Private Law. 1992. – 215 p.

307.Coleman J. The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford, 2001. – 248 p.

308.Costello M.J. Secret Identity Crisis: Comic Books and the Unmasking of Cold War America. New York: Continuum. 2009. – 293 p.

309.Cotterrell R. Law, Culture and Society. Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2006. – 205 p.

310.Devlin P. The Enforcement of Morals. – Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks, 1968. – 154 p.

311.Duranske B.T. Virtual Law. Navigating the Legal Landscape of Virtual Worlds. – Chicago, Illinois: ABA Publishing, American Bar Association. – 2008. – 461 p.

312.Feinberg J. Harm to Others. New York: Oxford University Press. 1984. – 288 p.

313.Fine G.A. Shared Fantasy: Role-Playing Games as Social Worlds. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1983. – 298 p.

314.Fuller L.L. Anatomy of the Law. New York and Toronto: The New American Library, 1969.

196 p.

315.Fuller L.L. The Morality of Law. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1964. –

202 p.

316.Goffman E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. – Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1974. – 586 p.

317.Handbook of the Sociology of Emotion: Volume II / Ed. by Stets J.E., Turner J.H. – Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer, 2014. – 578 p.

Источник: https://studfile.net/preview/16571856/