338
245.MDY INDUSTRIES, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, 629 F.3d 928 (9th Cir. 2010)
[Electronic resource] // CourtListener. – [Site]. – URL: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/181055/mdy-industries-llc-v-blizzard-entertainment/ (accessed: 24.02.2019).
246.Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc., 88 F.Supp. 2d 116, (S.D.N.Y. 1999) aff’d 210 F.3d 88 (2d Cir. 2000) [Electronic resource] // Justia. – [Site]. – URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/districtcourts/FSupp2/88/116/2579076/ (accessed: 28.01.2019).
247.Chung Fook v. White, 264 U.S. 443 (1924) [Electronic resource] // FindLaw. – [Site]. – URL: https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/264/443.html (accessed: 18.10.2018).
248.Hackbart v. Cincinnati Bengals, Inc., 601 F.2d 516 (10th Cir. 1979) [Electronic resource] // OpenJurist. – [Site]. – URL: https://openjurist.org/601/f2d/516/hackbart-v-cincinnati-bengals-inc (accessed: 24.02.2019).
249.Pub. Citizen v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 491 U.S. 440, 470-71 (1989) (Kennedy, J., concurring)
[Electronic resource] // Justia. – [Site]. – URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/491/440/ (accessed: 24.02.2019).
250.R v Dudley and Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273 DC [Electronic resource] // The University of Texas at Austin. – [Site]. – URL: https://la.utexas.edu/users/jmciver/357L/QueenvDS.PDF (accessed: 28.01.2019).
251.Re Sigsworth: Bedford v Bedford [1935] 1 Ch. 98 [Electronic resource] // E- Lawresources.co.uk. – [Site]. – URL: http://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/Re-Sigsworth.php (accessed: 18.10.2018).
252.United States v. Kirby, 74 U.S. 482 (1868) [Electronic resource] // Justia. – [Site]. – URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/74/482/ (accessed: 24.02.2019).
Academic articles
253.Abrutyn S. Money, Love, and Sacredness: Generalised Symbolic Media and the Production of Instrumental, Affectual, and Moral Reality // Czech Sociological Review. 2015. Vol. 51. No. 3. – PP. 445 – 471.
254.Alexy R. The Dual Nature of Law // Ratio Juris. – Vol. 23. – No. 2. – 2010 – PP. 167–182.
339
255.Arkhipov V.V., Naumov V.B. Pervasive Legal Problems of the Internet of Things and the Limits of Law: Russian Perspective // Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2018. Т. 13. № 6. С. 94–123.
256.Arkhipov V., Naumov V., The Legal Definition of Personal Data in the Regulatory Environment of the Russian Federation: Between Formal Certainty and Technological Development // Computer Law and Security Review. – Dorchester (UK), 2016. – Volume 32. – Issue 6. PP. – 868–887.
257.Arkhipov V.V., Virtual Worlds in Legal Studies. An Inquiry into the Subject of Research / 25th IVR World Congress of Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy Paper [Electronic resource] // Social Sciences Research Network. – [Site]. – URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2117762 (accessed: 04.02.2019).
258.Austin J. Truth / Supplementary Volume XXIV, 1950 [Electronic resource] // Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. The Virtual Issue No. 1. 2013. – [Site]. – URL: https://www.aristoteliansociety.org.uk/pdf/austin.pdf (accessed: 10.09.2019)
259.Bix B. Cautions and Caveats for the Application of Wittgenstein to Legal Theory [Electronic resource] / Law and Social Justice, Campbell, O’Rourke & Shier, eds, MIT Press, pp. 217–229 // Social Science Research Network. – [Site]. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=619123 (accessed: 10.09.2019).
260.Bix B. Robert Alexy, Radbruch’s Formula, and the Nature of Legal Theory // Rechtstheorie.
–Vol. 37. – 2006. – PP. 139–149.
261.Bix B. Radbruch’s Formula and Conceptual Analysis // The American Journal of Jurisprudence. 2011. Vol. 56. PP. 45 – 57.
262.Blackwell C., Carroll J. Minecraft Economics: A Study of Wealth Inequality in a Virtual World [Electronic resource] // Social Science Research Network. – 4 June 2018. – [Site]. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3185048 (accessed: 04.07.2018).
263.Briquel D. The Punishment of the Hellespont by Xerxes: Perception of Religious Behaviour of the Enemy in Conflict Situations [Electronic resource] // Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2016. No. 2. P. 51.
–URL: https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/136219 (accessed: 28.01.2019).
264.Castronova E. The Right to Play // New York Law School Law Review. – 2004. – Vol. 49. – No. 1. – PP. 185-210.
265.Chernilo D. The Theorization of Social Co-Ordinations in Differentiated Societies: The Theory of Generalized Symbolic Media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas // British Journal of Sociology. 2002. Vol. 53. Issue 3. – PP. 431 – 449.
340
266.Consalvo M. There is No Magic Circle [Electronic resource] // Games and Culture. – 2009. – Vol. 4, Issue 4. PP. 408 – 417. – URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1555412009343575 (accessed: 02.07.2018).
267.Dalton H.L. “Disgust” and Punishment // The Yale Law Journal. 1986-1987. Vol. 96. PP.
881–913.
268.Dickerson R. Statutory Interpretation: Core Meaning and Marginal Uncertainty // Missoury Law Review. – 1964. – Vol. 29. – PP. 1–12.
269.Duxbury N. Golden Rule Reasoning, Moral Judgment, and Law // Notre Dame Law Review. 2009. Vol. 84. Issue 4. PP. 1529–1605.
270.Dworkin R. Lord Devlin and the Enforcement of Morals // The Yale Law Journal. 19651966. Vol. 75. P. 986–1005.
271.Fairfield J., The Language-Game of Privacy // Michigan Law Review. – 2018. – Vol. 116. Issue 6. – P. 1171.
272.Fairfield J. The Magic Circle // Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law. – 2009. – No. 1 (May). – PP. 823 – 840.
273.Fuller L.L. Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart // Harvard Law Review. 1958. Vol. 71. P. 630-672.
274.Hamari J., Sjöblom M. What is eSports and why do people watch it? // Internet Research. – Vol. 27. – Issue 2. – PP. 211–232.
275.Hare R.M. The Promising Game // Revue Internationale de Philosophie. – 1964. – Vol. 18. – No. 70(4). – PP. 398–412. – URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23940466 (accessed: 26 July 2018).
276.Hart H.L.A. The Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals // Harvard Law Review. 1958. Vol. 71. P. 593-629.
277.Jellum L.D. But That Is Absurd! Why Specific Absurdity Undermines Textualism // Brooklyn Law Review. 2011. Vol. 76. PP. 917–939.
278.Jiang M. Authoritarian Informationalism: China’s Approach to Internet Sovereignty // SAIS Review of International Affairs. 2010. No. 30(2). PP. 71-89. – Available at Social Science Research
Network [Electronic resource]. – [Site]. – URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1702128 (accessed: 02.10.2018).
279. Jackson B.S. Towards a semiotic model of the games analogy in Jurisprudence // Droit et société. – 1991. – No. 17-18. – PP. 99 – 123. – doi: https://doi.org/10.3406/dreso.1991.1105.
341
280.Johnson H.M. The Generalized Symbolic Media in Parsons’ Theory // Sociology & Social Research. 1973. – PP. 208 – 221.
281.Klatt M. Semantic Normativity and the Objectivity of Legal Argumentation // ARSP: Archiv fur Rechtsund Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. 2004. Vol.
90.No. 1. PP. 51–65.
282.Lastowka G. The Player-Authors Project [Electronic resource] // Social Science Research Network. – 30 November 2013. – [Site]. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2361758 (accessed: 04.07.2018).
283.Lessig L. The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach [Electronic resource] // Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University Website. – [Site]. – URL: http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/works/lessig/finalhls.pdf (accessed: 26.01.2019).
284.MacCormick N. Legal Deduction, Legal Predicates and Expert Systems // Revue Internationale de semiotique juridique. – 1992. – Vol. 5. – P. 181–202.
285.Malaby T.M. Beyound Play: A New Approach to Games. [Electronic resource] // Social Science Research Network [Site]. – URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=922456 (accessed: 02.07.2018).
286.Manning J.F. The Absurdity Doctrine // Harvard Law Review. 2003. Vol. 116. PP. 2387–
2486.
287.Marmor A. The Pragmatics of Legal Language // Ratio Juris. – 2008. – No. 4. – PP. 423–
288.McIntyre J. Making the Law Explicit: The Normativity of Legal Argumentation. By Matthias Klatt // The Cambridge Law Journal. 2011. Vol. 70. No. 3. – PP. 674–676.
289.Midgley M. The Game Game // Philosophy. – 1974. – No. 189 (Jul., 1974). – PP. 231–253. – URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3750115 (accessed: 26 July 2018).
290.Nyberg A.K. Seal of Approval: The Origins and History of the Comics Code. Vol 1. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1994. – 1228 p. – [Electronic resource]. – [Site]. – URL: https://books.google.ru/books?id=WGDschFUKRQC&hl=ru&source=gbs_navlinks_s (accessed: 15.01.2019).
291.Polyakov A., The St. Petersburg School of Legal Philosophy and Russian Legal Thought // Russian Legal Realism / Ed. by Brozek B., Stanek J. and Stelmach J. – Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2018. – PP. 1–36.
342
292.Radbruch G. Statutory Lawlesness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946) // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2006. Vol. 26. No. 1. PP. 1 – 11.
293.Raessens J. The Ludic Turn in Media Theory / Lecture. 2012 [Electronic resource] / Utrecht University Repository. – [Site]. – URL: https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/255181 (accessed: 03.08.2019).
294.Rodriguez H. The Playful and the Serious: An approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens [Electronic resource] / Game Studies. The International Journal of Computer Game Research. 2006. Vol.
6.Issue 1 // “Game Studies”. – [Site]. – URL: http://gamestudies.org/0601/articles/rodriges (accessed: 25.07.2019).
295.Rustad M.L., D’Angelo D. The Path of Internet Law: An Annotated Guide to Legal Landmarks // Social Science Research Network Website, URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1799578 (accessed: 24.01.2019).
296.Sergeyeva O., Tsareva A., Zinoveva N., Kononova O. Social Skills Amongst MMORPGGamers: Empirical Study // SHS Web of Conferences. – 2018. – No. 50. PP. 1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001008.
297.Stanton-Ife J. The Limits of Law [Electronic resource] // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). – [Site]. – URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/law-limits/ (accessed: 17.10.2018).
298.Staszewski G. Avoiding Absurdity // Indiana Law Journal. 2006. Vol. 81. PP. 1001–1065.
299.Stenros J. In Defence of Magic Circle: The Social and Mental Boundaries of Play [Electronic resource] / Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2012 Conference: Local and Global – Games in Culture and Society // Digital Games Research Association. – [Site]. – URL: http://www.digra.org/wp- content/uploads/digital-library/12168.43543.pdf (accessed: 06.02.2019).
300.Thacker L.E. Interpretation and Legal Theory. A. Marmor. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992,
193pp. (Review) // Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies. – 1993. – Vol. 2. – PP. 330–338.
301.Treviňo J., Talcott Parsons Today. His Theory and Legacy in Contemporary Sociology / Ed. by A. Javier Treviňo, Foreword by Neil J. Smelser. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2001.
– 261 p.
302.Turner T.S. Parsons’ Concept of “Generalized Media of Social Interaction” and its Relevance for Social Anthropology // Sociological Inquiry. 1968. Vol. 38. Issue 2. – PP. 121 – 134.