318
26.Program for Development of the Federal State Educational Institution of Higher Education “Saint-Petersburg State University until 2020”, approved by the Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 07.10.2010. (ed. on 22.11.2017) [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system “ConsultantPlus” (date of application: 11.09.2019).
27.Order of the Committee for Science and Higher School of the Government of St. Petersburg of 07.05.2018 No. 47 [Electronic resource] // Committee for Science and Higher School of the Government of St. Petersburg. – [Website]. – URL: http://knvsh.gov.spb.ru/closedcontests/view/188/ (accessed: 08.11.2018).
28.Programme «Digital Economy of the Russian Federation», approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 28 July 2017 No. 1632-р. [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 21.02.2019).
29.Strategy for the Development of the Information Society in the Russian Federation for 2017 – 2030: approved by Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 09.05.2017 No. 203 // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. – 15 May 2017. – No. 20. – Art. 2901.
30.Criminal Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]: 13.06.1996 No. 63–FZ (ed. of 27.12.2018). – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
31.Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]: 18.12.2001 No. 174–FZ (ed. of 08.01.2019). – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
Legal practice
32.Appellate Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia of 14.05.2013, Case No. 33–1306/2013 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
33.Appellate Ruling of the Moscow City Court of 14.03.2018, Case No. 33–10610 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
34.Appellate Ruling of the Kaliningrad Oblast’ Court of 14.08.2013, Case No. 33–3468/2013 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
35.Appellate Ruling of the Perm Kray Court of 04.02.2015, Case No. 33–887 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
319
36.Appellate Ruling of the Perm Kray Court of 02.04.2013, Case No. 33–2961–2014 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
37.Appellate Ruling of the Perm Kray Court of 12.11.2012, Case No. 33–10042 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
38.Appellate Ruling of the Perm Kray Court of 08.08.2012, Case No. 33–6866 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
39.Appellate Ruling of the Samara Oblast’ Court of 11.09.2012, Case No. 33–8461 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
40.Appellate Ruling of the Samara Oblast’ Court of 26.06.2012, Case No. 33–5960 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
41.Information on the ECtHR judgment of 20.10.2015 in the case of M’Bala M’Bala v. France (complaint No. 25239/13) [Electronic resource] // Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights. – 2016. – No. 3. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2018).
42.Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. the Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD) and Mario Costeja Gonzalez [Electronic resource] // Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights. Russian edition. – 2014. – No. 9. – P. 22–23. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2018).
43.On some issues of dispute resolution practice related to the application of Article 169 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation of 10.04.2008 No. 22. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
44.On the application by the courts of certain provisions of Section I of Part 1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 23.06.2015 No. 25. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
45.On judicial practice in cases of open theft and robbery [Electronic resource]: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 22.03.1966 No. 31. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
46.On judicial practice in cases of theft, open theft and robbery [Electronic resource]: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 27.12.2002 No. 29 (ed. of 16.05.2017).
–Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.01.2019).
320
47.On judicial practice in criminal cases of hooliganism and other crimes committed out of hooliganism [Electronic resource]: Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 15.11.2007 No. 45. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 10.09.2018).
48.Ruling of the Basmanny District Court of Moscow of 01.06.2011, Case No. 11–43/11 and Case No. 11–115/09 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
49.Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 06.09.2016 No. 16–KG16–30 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
50.Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 18.04.2016 No. 308–ES15–18008, Case No. A32–35215/2014 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
51.Ruling of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 09.03.2016, No. 308–ES15–18008 in the case No. A32–35215/2014 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
52.Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 08.06.2004 No. 226–O «On refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of the open joint–stock company «Ufa Oil Refinery» on violation of constitutional rights and freedoms by Article 169 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and Paragraph 3 Item 11 Article 7 of the Law of the Russian Federation «On Tax Bodies of the Russian Federation» [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 02.10.2018).
53.Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 26.06.2011 No. 684–O–O «On the refusal to accept for consideration of the complaint of citizen Shevchenko Evgeny Igorevich on the violation of his constitutional rights by Articles 1062 and 1063 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 02.10.2018).
54.Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 484–O–P of 2 April 2009 on a complaint by citizens of S. M. Shimovolos, A. V. Lashmankin and D. P. Shadrin concerning violations of their constitutional rights by Part 5 Article 5 of the Federal Law «On meetings, rallies, demonstrations, marches and picketing» [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
321
55.Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 02.11.2006 No. 444–O «On the complaint of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation on the violation of the constitutional rights of a citizen Irina Astakhova by Sub-item 1 Item 1 Article 220 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation» [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
56.Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 11.03.2005 No. 3–O «On the complaint of a citizen Rinat Mirgalimovich Smakov for violation of his constitutional rights by the provisions of Article 14 of the Federal Constitutional Law «On the judicial system of the Russian Federation (as amended by the Federal Constitutional Law of 15 December 2001), Item 3 Article 6.1 and Paragraph 2 Item 1 of Article 11 of the Law of the Russian Federation «On the status of judges in the Russian Federation (as amended by the Federal Law of 15 December 2001)» [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
57.Ruling of the Presidium of the Moscow City Court of 18.09.2018 in Case No. 44г-259/18 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
58.Ruling of the Moscow City Court of 10.03.2011, Case No. 4g/1–1668 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
59.Ruling of the Primorsky Kray Court of 23.06.2014, Case No. 33–5131 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
60.Ruling of the St. Petersburg City Court of 18.04.2012 No. 22–2281/2012 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
61.Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District of 18.06.2015, No. F05– 7093/2015, Case No. A40–91072/14 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
62.Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District of 12.10.2015 No. F05– 13554/2015, Case No. A40–56211/14 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
63.European Court of Human Rights Ruling of 24.01.2017 «The case of Khamtokhu and Aksenchik v. the Russian Federation (complaints No. 60367/08 and 961/11) [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
64.Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 07.03.2017 No. 5–P «On the case of verification of the constitutionality of Item 1 Part 3 of Article 81 and Article 401.6 of the Code
322
of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation in connection with complaints of citizen A.E. Pevzner» [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
65.Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 28.06.2007 No. 8–P «On the verification of the constitutionality of Article 14.1 of the Federal Law «On burial and funeral business» and the Regulation on the burial of persons whose death occurred as a result of the suppression of their terrorist act in connection with the complaint of citizens K.I. Guziev and E.H. Karmova» [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
66.Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 28 June 2011 No. 11 «On judicial practice in criminal cases on crimes of extremist orientation» [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 02.10.2018).
67.Resolution No. 32 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 20 September 2018 «On the introduction of amendments to Resolution No. 11 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 28 June 2011 «On judicial practice in criminal cases involving extremist crimes». [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 02.10.2018).
68.Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Mordovia of 19.04.2012 No. 44–g–7 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
69.Resolution of the Court of the Jewish Autonomous Region of 13.03.2013 in the case No. 4–A– 8/2013 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 12.02.2019).
70.Decision of the Zavodoukovsky District Court of the Tyumen Region of 12 July 2016, Case
No. |
2–662/2016. |
– |
[Website]. |
– |
URL: |
https://zavodoukovsky–– |
tum.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=25808719&delo_id=15 40005&new=0&text_number=1 (accessed: 02.10.2018).
71.Decision of the Leninsky District Court of Vladivostok of 18.06.2008, Case No. 2–228/08 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 12.02.2019).
72.Decision of the Samara Oblast’ Court of 26.06.2014 No. 21–311/2014 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).
73.Decision of Chertanovsky District Court of Moscow of 07.12.2018, Case No. 02-4488/2018 [Electronic resource]. – Access from the legal reference system «ConsultantPlus» (accessed: 31.01.2019).