540
ADVANCED IMAGING OF THE ABDOMEN
A B
|
Figure 9.18. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma and liver metastasis.The |
|
tumors are (A) hypointense on T1– (arrows) and (B) hyperintense |
|
on T2–weighted MR images. C: Marked peripheral enhancement |
|
is evident after IV contrast. Lack of central enhancement suggests |
|
necrosis. (Source: From Burgener FA, Meyers SP, Tan RK, Zaunbauer |
|
W. Differential Diagnosis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. |
C |
Stuttgart: Thieme, 2002, with permission.) |
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple proce- |
of adjacent arteries are performed. Such aggres- |
dure) is performed for cure in selected patients |
sive surgical approaches appear to prolong |
with a carcinoma in the head of the pancreas. |
survival. |
Even the presence of lymph nodes metastases |
The Whipple procedure consists of resection |
is no longer considered a contraindication to |
of the head of the pancreas, adjacent duodenum |
resection by some surgeons. The postoperative |
and gastric antrum, and three anastomoses— |
survival in patients with extrapancreatic neural |
choledochojejunostomy (or hepaticojejunos- |
plexus involvement is significantly lower than in |
tomy), pancreaticojejunostomy (or pancreatico- |
those without such involvement. |
gastrostomy), and a gastrojejunostomy. Any one |
The immediate surgical mortality and mor- |
of these may leak, although the pancreaticoje- |
bidity rates have been decreasing, and some |
junostomy site is more prone to disruption than |
surgeons are performing more radical opera- |
other anastomoses and thus some surgeons |
tions. In addition to a Whipple procedure, |
prefer a pancreaticogastrostomy. Others dis- |
some surgeons are dissecting lymph nodes |
agree and believe that the risk of fistula forma- |
and excising retroperitoneal nerves. If neces- |
tion is comparable with the two anastomoses |
sary, portal vein resection and even resection |
(144). Also, some surgeons prefer to leave the |