GALLBLADDER AND BILE DUCTS
portal vein is occasionally also in the differential diagnosis.
Staging
Table 8.7 lists the TNM classification of extrahepatic bile duct tumors. Most imaging modalities tend to understage hilar adenocarcinomas; invasion of adjacent lymph nodes and liver infiltration often occur without significant imaging findings. Computed tomography is inaccurate in establishing resectability in these mostly unresectable tumors. With an extensive tumor, however, imaging studies correctly predict unresectability, and imaging thus is useful when evaluating potential resectability. If
Table 8.7. Tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of extrahepatic bile duct tumors
Primary tumor: |
|
|
Tx |
Primary tumor cannot be assessed |
|
T0 |
No evidence of primary tumor |
|
Tis |
Carcinoma-in-situ |
|
|
T1 |
Tumor confined to bile duct |
|
T2 |
Tumor beyond wall of bile duct |
|
T3 |
Tumor invades liver, gallbladder, pancreas, |
|
and/or unilateral branch of portal vein |
T4 |
Tumor invades main portal vein, common |
|
hepatic artery, or adjacent structures |
Lymph nodes: |
|
|
Nx |
Regional nodes cannot be assessed |
|
N0 |
No regional lymph node metastasis |
|
N1 |
Regional lymph node metastasis |
|
Distant metastasis: |
|
|
Mx |
Distant metastases cannot be assessed |
|
M0 |
No distant metastasis |
|
|
M1 |
Distant metastasis |
|
|
Tumor stages: |
|
|
Stage 0 |
Tis |
N0 |
M0 |
Stage IA |
T1 |
N0 |
M0 |
Stage IB |
T2 |
N0 |
M0 |
Stage IIA |
T3 |
N0 |
M0 |
Stage IIB |
T1 |
N1 |
M0 |
|
T2 |
N1 |
M0 |
|
T3 |
N1 |
M0 |
Stage III |
T4 |
any N |
M0 |
Stage IV |
any T |
any N |
M1 |
|
|
|
|
Source: From the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edition (2002), published by Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, used with permission of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Chicago, IL.
needed, intrahepatic spread is best studied with arterial portography. The primary role of angiography is to detect involvement of either the hepatic artery or the portal vein and their branches, although as already mentioned, multidetector CT angiography may supplant this role.
Percutaneous intraductal US can accurately T-stage these cholangiocarcinomas, but this technique is not widely available.
Imaging detects lobar atrophy, level of biliary obstruction, parenchymal invasion, or portal vein invasion. Both CT portography and US understage extrahepatic metastases, which are present at subsequent surgery in almost half of these patients. An MRCP is useful not only to identify an obstruction level but also as an aid in determining the extent of biliary ductal involvement and in planning drainage procedures.
Therapy
Portal vein invasion and obstruction lead to parenchymal atrophy, and imaging detection of atrophy is thus presumptive evidence of such invasion. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas are generally considered unresectable in the presence of metastases, invasion of the right or left hepatic arteries or main portal vein branches, or extensive growth into adjacent liver parenchyma, although portal vein reconstruction is performed in some centers. Portal vein stent insertion is worthwhile in an occasional patient with portal vein invasion to treat portal hypertension with its associated bleeding complications.
If a hilar cholangiocarcinoma is resectable, a surgical intrahepatic anastomosis offers the hope of a cure. At times an extended right hepatectomy is necessary not only for tumor resection but also to resect undrainable segments.
A potential cure is possible with liver transplantation.
A biliary stent is left in place after resection or transplantation, providing access for followup cholangiography and serving as a useful landmark for follow-up imaging.
With an unresectable tumor, either percutaneous or endoscopic biliary stenting provides palliative drainage, relieves pruritus, and