ABDOMINAL VASCULATURE
Imaging
Imaging findings differ between acute and chronic liver outflow obstruction. Hepatomegaly, especially with caudate lobe enlargement and central liver contrast enhancement are common with acute obstruction. Left lobe, and especially caudate lobe hypertrophy and an irregular liver surface develop on a more chronic basis. Liver enhancement varies in chronic obstruction depending on degree of subcapsular collaterals and portal blood stasis. Homogeneous enhancement is found with less severe chronic obstruction, probably due to extensive collateral drainage.
The gold standard in diagnosing Budd-Chiari syndrome is inferior cavography and selective hepatic venography, yet the diagnosis can often be suspected with CT, US, MRI, or scintigraphy. Occasionally the condition is misdiagnosed as an infiltrating tumor. In particular, portal vein blood flow abnormalities are common in Budd-Chiari syndrome, and a misdiagnosis of primary portal hypertension should be avoided.
Computed tomography in patients with acute Budd-Chiari syndrome reveals hepatomegaly, a heterogeneous hypodense liver showing decreased central postcontrast enhancement, and marked ascites. Caudate lobe enlargement is common even with an acute onset, at times compressing the adjacent inferior vena cava. Veins draining the caudate lobe dilate. An irregular liver outline develops, but the liver is not nodular as found in cirrhosis.
Ultrasonography suggests Budd-Chiari syndrome if gray-scale US identifies hepatic veins and Doppler US detects either no blood flow or a reversal of flow. Likewise, the syndrome should be suspected if both gray-scale and Doppler US fail to identify hepatic veins. Normal flow in the inferior vena cava varies with respirations and cardiac cycle, but in some patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and partial vena caval obstruction either reversed or continuous caval flow is detected by Doppler US. Still, the specificity with US is low.
Not only does the caudal lobe enlarge in Budd-Chiari syndrome, but the caudate vein also becomes prominent. In fact, US detection of a caudate vein equal to or >3mm in diameter, in the appropriate clinical setting, should suggest Budd-Chiari syndrome (93).
Both morphological and perfusion abnormalities are defined with MR angiography. The MR postcontrast appearance varies depending on chronicity. Acute Budd-Chiari syndrome results in early homogeneous enhancement of an enlarged caudate lobe and heterogeneously decreased enhancement of the rest of the liver; central liver portions enhance considerably more than the periphery. Magnetic resonance imaging identifies ascites, major hepatic vein thrombi, and alternate venous pathways; it detects either hepatic vein thrombosis or simply the absence of hepatic venous flow (94).
During the subacute obstruction phase, postcontrast CT enhancement differences between the central and peripheral liver become less pronounced than during the acute phase. Computed tomography of chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome results in caudate lobe and usually left lobe hypertrophy and varying degrees of right lobe atrophy, with the hypertrophic regions having heterogeneous postcontrast enhancement. Ascites is not as prominent as with an acute syndrome. Computed tomography arterial portography reveals similar heterogeneous liver contrast enhancement in a setting of vascular congestion.
Fibrosis ensues during the chronic phase, identified by its hypointense signal on both T1and T2-weighted images. Major venous thrombosis is not a prominent feature of chronic Budd-Chiari syndrome; instead, detected are extensive collaterals, caudate lobe enlargement, and regenerative nodules in less affected portions of the liver. These nodules are hyperintense on T1and isoto hypointense on T2-weighted images and enhance during the arterial phase. Collateral vessels are best identified during the portal vein phase.
Inferior vena caval involvement ranges from obstruction by a thrombus, to a web resulting in partial obstruction, to the vena cava being compressed by an enlarged caudate lobe. Occasionally vena cavography and hepatic venography fail to identify the full extent of venous outflow obstruction; in such a setting percutaneous transhepatic venography appears useful to define the proximal and distal ends of an occlusion.
With a simple obstruction the portal venous system is not affected, but an extensive obstruction results in flow reversal. Alternate venous