109
DUODENUM
A veiled right kidney is a US finding of a retroperitoneal duodenal perforation (6).
A bullet causes not only duodenal but also adjacent organ damage. Fistulas are one sequela, at times to unusual sites such as a pyeloduodenal fistula, if damage is not recognized initially.
Wall Thickening
Infection/Inflammation
Some infections manifest primarily in the proximal small bowel, whereas others are detected distally. For convenience, most small bowel infections are discussed in Chapter 4.
Duodenitis
The term duodenitis implies duodenal inflammation and is a histologic diagnosis, although endoscopists often apply this term to a gross reddened mucosa believed to represent inflammation.
Myriad conditions thicken duodenal valvulae conniventes: infections, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, amyloidosis, mastocytosis, lymphangiectasia, infiltrating neoplasms, Crohn’s disease, and other entities. Ischemic duodenitis in the absence of prior surgery should suggest a small vessel vasculitis. Using thickened folds as a criterion for duodenitis, an upper gastrointestinal examination in children achieved a 46% sensitivity and 98% specificity for detecting duodenitis, compared to 54% sensitivity and 92% specificity for endoscopy (7); the low sensitivities were due mostly to normal findings for both radiology and endoscopy in children with mild duodenitis.
Peptic Ulcer Disease
The discovery of Helicobacter pylori has modified our understanding of peptic ulcer disease pathogenesis. Thus antral infection with H. pylori promotes antral gastritis, increased gastrin release, and increased acid production. Duodenal bulb H. pylori colonization promotes bulbar gastric metaplasia, leading to further H. pylori infection, more inflammation, and further inability to neutralize gastric acid load. In some patients this cycle persists until an ulcer
develops. Probably both bulbar gastric metaplasia and bulbar H. pylori colonization are necessary to develop a duodenal ulcer. Both the prevalence and the extent of gastric metaplasia and the amount of H. pylori in the duodenal bulb in patients with a duodenal ulcer are much higher than in those with a gastric ulcer or chronic gastritis. Eradication of H. pylori decreases the amount of acid entering the duodenum, and duodenal inflammation subsides.
Peptic ulcer disease is more prevalent in cirrhotic patients and those in chronic renal failure than in the general population. In cirrhotics, antral H. pylori colonization does not appear to play a major role in duodenal peptic ulcer disease.
Postbulbar duodenal peptic duodenitis is uncommon. At times a barium study reveals postbulbar ulcerations, thickened folds, or even a stenosis, and an endoscopic biopsy identifies inflammation; because peptic duodenitis here is uncommon, focal pancreatitis in an annular pancreas or celiac disease should be suspected and an endomysial antibody test obtained. In some patients an endoscopic biopsy revealed villous atrophy.
A barium study of peptic ulcer disease is usually straightforward. Ulcers in unusual locations and recurrent ulcers are more problematic. Peptic ulcer disease in younger children, although uncommon, does result in an unusual presentation and radiologic appearance. Ultrasonography reveals focal duodenal wall thickening, at times even an echogenic line adjacent to the ulcer, but US is rarely employed to detect duodenal ulcers.
Occasionally encountered is a giant duodenal ulcer; cocaine and methamphetamine use is associated with some of these giant ulcers, although many are idiopathic.
Some perforated duodenal ulcers result in a pneumoperitoneum and peritonitis. Other ulcers perforate into an adjacent structure, including pancreas, liver, bile ducts, and adjacent colon. Duodenocolic and duodenocholedochal fistulas secondary to peptic ulcer disease are rare. At times such a perforation clinically mimics myocardial ischemia; conventional radiographs should suggest a correct diagnosis.
Contrast-enhanced CT of a perforating ulcer reveals focal bowel wall thickening, enhancement, and inflammatory changes in surround-
110
ing tissues. A wall defect at the site of perforation is rarely detected. On the other hand, extraluminal gas bubbles, at times in Morison’s pouch, should be sought. A water-soluble upper gastrointestinal contrast study, although out of vogue in a number of institutions, remains a viable alternative.
Crohn’s Disease
Duodenal Crohn’s disease is notoriously difficult to diagnose. A biopsy is often of little help, most often revealing nonspecific inflammation and only occasionally containing granulomas. Imaging findings include aphtha, a peptic ulcer-like appearance, fistula, a stenotic segment varying in length, or complete obstruction (Fig. 3.2). Presence of thickened folds may be the only clue to Crohn’s disease. Fistulas are less common than with ileal involvement. Most duodenocolic fistulas are secondary to colonic Crohn’s disease rather than duodenal Crohn’s. Occasionally duodenal deformity is secondary to Crohn’s disease in an adjacent loop of bowel. A double-contrast barium study should differentiate between primary and secondary duodenal involvement.
A number of patients with duodenal Crohn’s have undergone a Billroth I operation in the
ADVANCED IMAGING OF THE ABDOMEN
mistaken belief that their underlying deformity was secondary to peptic ulcer disease. Invariably inflammation and strictures progress.
Diverticulitis
Diverticula are more common in the duodenum than in the rest of the small bowel, yet duodenal diverticulitis is sufficiently rare to be a curiosity. Clinically, duodenal diverticulitis mimics peptic ulcer disease, cholecystitis, or pancreatitis. A number of patients have unsuspected duodenal diverticulitis first detected at exploratory laparotomy for an acute abdomen, an understandable event given the rarity of this condition.
A barium study should detect thickened duodenal folds secondary to duodenal inflammation. Computed tomography identifies any associated inflammation and abscess. Inflammation medial to the duodenal sweep suggests focal pancreatitis (and indeed adjacent portions of the pancreas tend to be inflamed). Perforations lead either to a focal walled-off cavity or peritoneal spill. Extraluminal gas can range from focal bubbles to pneumoperitoneum.
Most duodenal diverticula are peri-Vaterian in location and, when infected, surrounding inflammation thus is centered around the duodenopancreatic interface. Imaging differential diagnosis includes focal pancreatitis (at times suggesting an inflamed annular pancreas) or postbulbar ulcer disease.
Figure 3.2. Duodenal Crohn’s disease in a patient with known ileal disease. A duodenal stricture and effaced valvulae conniventes are evident (arrow). (Courtesy of Daniel Wopperer, M.D., Rochester, New York.)
Associated with Dialysis and Pancreatitis
Thickened duodenal folds are common in patients on dialysis. Although patients in renal failure have an increased prevalence of peptic ulcer disease, not all dialysis patients with thickened folds have clinical peptic ulcer disease.
Duodenal involvement is common in acute pancreatitis, even to the point of obstruction. Thickened folds are seen in a setting of chronic pancreatitis.
Tuberculosis
Even in endemic regions duodenal tuberculosis is rare, and this diagnosis is thus often not suspected.
Duodenal stenosis was discovered in a 69- year-old man who also had common bile duct
111
DUODENUM
obstruction due to stones (8); Crohn’s disease was initially suspected, and therapy with corticosteroids was instituted until tuberculosis was identified.
Sarcoidosis
The liver followed by the stomach are the most common abdominal organs involved. Small bowel sarcoidosis, including duodenal, is uncommon. Gastrointestinal tract sarcoidosis is one cause for a protein-losing enteropathy. Sarcoidosis involving the papilla can obstruct the common bile duct.
Radiographically, sarcoidosis mimics Crohn’s disease.
Amyloidosis
Duodenal amyloidosis is uncommon. Clinically, diffuse amyloid infiltration leads to lumen narrowing and, with extensive involvement, obstruction. Occasionally infiltration is polypoid in appearance.
Cystic Dystrophy
An unusual condition, duodenal cystic dystrophy is associated with chronic pancreatitis and presents as focal duodenal wall thickening. At times associated with heterotopic pancreatic tissue, and with about half the affected patients having chronic pancreatitis, the relationship of duodenal cystic dystrophy to duplication cysts is speculation. Most cystic dystrophy foci contain cysts, but an occasional one is solid. Some of these cystic structures suggest dilated ducts lined with exocrine pancreatic epithelium. A rare one evolves into an abscess. Occasionally a thickened duodenal wall progresses to a stricture. Whether this entity is simply inflammation of heterotopic tissue is conjecture. In either case, the spectrum consists of cysts, fibrosis, and possible stricture.
Imaging in patients with duodenal cystic dystrophy reveals a thickened duodenal wall and intramural cysts varying in size. Some of these cysts are >1cm in diameter, the thickened duodenal wall is isodense on precontrast CT and varies from hypovascular to exhibiting strong contrast enhancement (9). Duodenal cystic dystrophy appears mostly hypoechoic with US.
Necrosis
Caustic ingestion generally results in esophageal and, less often, gastric injury. Occasionally, however, it is associated duodenal injury, even necrosis. In general, contrast imaging is safe in these individuals.
Tumors
Nonneoplastic
Hyperplastic/Metaplastic
Hyperplastic or metaplastic duodenal polyps are uncommon. A rare metaplastic polyp occurs in the duodenal bulb and is associated with H. pylori, regressing after anti–H. pylori therapy.
Heterotopic Tissue
Heterotopic pancreatic tissue is common in the duodenal wall. This tissue contains acini and ducts, but not islet cells. Occasionally localized inflammation within such heterotopic tissue results in valvulae conniventes thickening and eventually evolves into a duodenal stricture.
Less often encountered in the duodenum is heterotopic gastric tissue. Both chief cells and parietal cells are present.
Hamartoma
Brunner gland hamartomas are most common in the first portion of the duodenum and most occur in middle-aged individuals. Although submucosal in origin, an occasional one becomes pedunculated. Some are several centimeters in size. They consist of proliferating Brunner gland tissue surrounded by fibrosis, fat, and lymphoid tissue. These hamartomas bleed, obstruct if they are large enough, or are simply an incidental finding.
Patients with untreated sprue develop multiple small polyps scattered throughout the duodenal bulb. These polyps probably represent Brunner’s gland hyperplasia, although they may represent an intrinsic abnormality of sprue.
An isolated myoepithelial hamartoma is rare in the duodenum; most of these occur in a setting of one of the polyposis syndromes. An isolated duodenal hamartomatous polyp occasionally also contains an adenocarcinoma.
112
Polyposis Syndromes
Polyposis syndromes are discussed in more detail in Chapter 5. Covered here are only those aspects pertinent to the duodenum.
Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis develop polyps in the stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and colon. True prevalence of duodenal polyposis in these patients is not known, because small adenomas are often not visualized either by imaging or endoscopy. Also, part of the confusion involves a definition of the term polyp; not all adenomas in familial polyposis protrude into the lumen. An endoscopic duodenal search of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis detects adenomas in 30% to 60% of patients; these tumors tend to be either flat or flat-topped elevations with a central depression. The most common duodenal location is periampullary. An occasional duodenal polyp is a villous adenoma.
These patients are at increased risk of developing a papilla of Vater carcinoma, and a duodenal adenocarcinoma is a not uncommon cause of death in familial polyposis patients who have had a previous colectomy. They are also prone to developing mesenteric fibromatosis.
Periampullary adenomas have been removed endoscopically, although the long-term results of such therapy are not known. Prophylactic pancreaticoduodenal resection has been performed for severe duodenal polyposis (10).
Bulbar Tumors
Primary duodenal bulb neoplasms are so rare that an average physician will not encounter one in a lifetime of practice. They are probably reportable. Only occasional descriptions exist of bulbar villous adenomas and adenocarcinomas.
An early bulbar cancer (well-differentiated papillary adenocarcinoma) was detected on a barium study as a smooth, sessile polyp (11). A very rare one develops in a setting of a chronic or refractory bulbar ulcer, but bulbar ulcers are not considered to be premalignant.
More common duodenal bulb neoplasms are benign mesenchymal tumors such as leiomyoma or lipoma. A rare metastatic melanoma mimics a benign ulcer; in some parts of the world resected skin tumors are not examined by
ADVANCED IMAGING OF THE ABDOMEN
a pathologist and thus a patient may not be aware of a prior melanoma resection.
Periampullary Tumors
Clinical
Discussed here are tumors originating from the papilla of Vater and adjacent duodenum. Bile duct tumors are covered in Chapter 8, and pancreatic origin tumors are discussed in Chapter 9.
Linguistic purists argue about correct usage, but the terms periampullary, papillary, and peri-Vaterian tumor are synonymously used in the literature and are descriptive terms for tumors of the mid-descending duodenum, papilla of Vater, pancreas adjacent to the papilla, sphincter of Oddi, and even distal common bile duct. Some malignant tumors infiltrate surrounding structures to the point that a specific site of origin cannot be identified. Nevertheless, the site of origin should be sought because of prognostic differences. Thus a carcinoma of the papilla of Vater is associated with a better prognosis than a carcinoma originating from adjacent pancreas.
The two most common periampullary tumors are adenoma and adenocarcinoma. An adenoma, quite often villous, can be quite large and not cause biliary obstruction (Fig. 3.3). These adenomas are premalignant. Once jaundice ensues in a patient with a known peri-Vaterian adenoma, however, malignant degeneration and invasion is likely. An occasional peri-Vaterian carcinoma first manifests as pancreatitis. In general, a cancer originating at the papilla that has not spread through the sphincter of Oddi invades locally; on the other hand, a tumor penetrating through the sphincter tends to metastasize to regional lymph nodes. Also, a malignancy penetrating the duodenal muscularis propria generally has a poor prognosis.
Other papillary tumors are uncommon and an occasional one is difficult to classify. A papilla of Vater adenomyoma produced obstructive jaundice (12). A rare carcinosarcoma and a primary carcinoma containing both glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation have been reported at the papilla.
Patients with von Recklinghausen’s disease are prone to developing peri-Vaterian tumors,
113
DUODENUM
Figure 3.3. Peri-Vaterian villous adenoma (arrows). A focus of carcinoma can readily be present and thus a biopsy showing no cancer is of limited help with these tumors. (Courtesy of Arunas Gasparaitis, M.D., University of Chicago.)
some being rather uncommon, such as a somatostatinoma (13).A very rare peri-Vaterian tumor acts as a lead point for common bile duct prolapse (14).
Imaging
Even when small, some papilla cancers obstruct the bile ducts, yet neither endoscopy nor imaging is able to detect them. With further growth these tumors are readily identified with an imaging study or endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. An occasional periampullary carcinoma is not detected initially at ERCP but becomes evident as a protruding mass only after a papillotomy.
Peri-Vaterian carcinomas range in appearance from primarily polypoid and intraluminal, primarily intramural and infiltrating the duodenal wall, growing mostly into the pancreatic head, to those with a mixed growth pattern. Those growing into the pancreas are often indistinguishable from a cholangiocarcinoma or primary pancreatic carcinoma both by imaging and histology (Fig. 3.4).
Transabdominal US has a limited role in detecting these tumors.
A mostly intramural neoplasm has to be >1cm or so to be identified by endoscopic US. Nevertheless, of periampullary tumors requir-
A B
Figure 3.4. A: Carcinoma of papilla. Contrast-enhanced CT reveals a nonenhancing tumor involving descending duodenum and pancreatic head (arrows). A distended gallbladder is evident. (Courtesy of Patrick Fultz, M.D., University of Rochester.) B: Carcinoma originating close to the papilla of Vater. Extensive bile duct and pancreatic invasion is present. Exact site of tumor origin could not be determined.
114
ing surgery, endoscopic US can correctly stage 75% to 85% of these tumors; although regional adenopathy is detected, more distant metastases cannot be evaluated. Similar to other imaging, endoscopic US cannot differentiate between benign and malignant adenopathy.
Intraductal US using high-frequency sonographic catheters appears useful in staging papillary cancers. This technique can confirm whether a tumor extends into duodenal submucosa, is limited to Oddi’s muscle, or whether it invades pancreas; intraductal US is less sensitive in detecting lymph node metastases.
High-spatial-resolution MRI should identify most periVaterian tumors, in one study achieving a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 100% in assessing of tumor invasion (15). PeriVaterian carcinomas are hypointense on precontrast T1-weighted images and enhance less than normal pancreas on immediate postgadolinium SGE images. Tumor conspicuity is greatest on immediate postcontrast images. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in some of these patients shows varying degrees of common bile duct and pancreatic duct dilation.
At most sites biopsy is necessary to establish a histologic diagnosis. In spite of this advice, some surgeons do not obtain a percutaneous biopsy or even retrograde cholangiopancreatography if an imaging study defines the tumor and its proximal extent, arguing that such preoperative studies do not alter a decision for surgical exploration and, in fact, may cause complications. They believe that visualization by noninvasive imaging should suffice.
Tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging for papilla of Vater tumors is outlined in Table 3.2.
Therapy
An ampullectomy has been performed for small benign tumors and T1 carcinomas originating in the papilla of Vater.
Initially performed early in the 20th century, pancreaticoduodenectomy for a periampullary carcinoma was advocated by Whipple in the 1930s, and since then this operation continues to bear his name. Over the years a number of modifications have been introduced, and currently many surgeons opt for a pyloruspreserving variant. The indications for a Whipple procedure have also expanded and
ADVANCED IMAGING OF THE ABDOMEN
Table 3.2. Tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging of papilla of Vater tumors
Primary tumor:
Tx |
Primary tumor cannot be assessed |
T0 |
No evidence of primary tumor |
Tis |
Carcinoma-in-situ |
T1 |
Tumor limited to ampulla of Vater or sphincter |
|
of Oddi |
T2 |
Tumor invades duodenal wall |
T3 |
Tumor invades pancreas |
T4 |
Tumor invades peripancreatic soft tissues or |
|
adjacent organs |
Lymph nodes:
Nx Regional nodes cannot be assessed
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis
N1 Metastasis to regional nodes
Distant metastasis:
Mx Distant metastases cannot be assessed M0 No distant metastasis
M1 Distant metastasis
Tumor stages: |
|
|
|
Stage 0 |
Tis |
N0 |
M0 |
Stage IA |
T1 |
N0 |
M0 |
Stage IB |
T2 |
N0 |
M0 |
Stage IIA |
T3 |
N0 |
M0 |
Stage IIB |
T1 |
N1 |
M0 |
|
T2 |
N1 |
M0 |
|
T3 |
N1 |
M0 |
Stage III |
T4 |
any N |
M0 |
Stage IV |
any T |
any N |
M1 |
Source: From the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edition (2002), published by Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, used with permission of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), Chicago, IL.
now include a potentially curable carcinoma in the pancreatic head (complications and imaging of the postoperative Whipple procedure are discussed in Chapter 9). If a Whipple procedure is contraindicated because of metastatic disease or poor patient condition, insertion of a palliative biliary drainage prosthesis is an option.
Potentially, resection of a peri-Vaterian carcinoma should have a high cure rate. Nevertheless, a number of these patients do not undergo curative resection due to age, poor health, or advanced disease. Catheter stenting in poor surgical risk patients is a viable option. Evidence suggests that preoperative biliary drainage in these patients results in decreased morbidity and shorter postoperative hospitalization (16).